Showing posts with label #DohCanada. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #DohCanada. Show all posts

May 8, 2015

Bill C-51: Asking the basic questions - Why, Where, When, What, Who?

Some genuinely curious Canadians are puzzled by the vociferous and passionate opposition to Bill C-51 -- why is it so bad?  Some have read the Bill and not found anything too controversial in it.  Others have pointed to the Government making some changes in the Bill's language.  Still others have expressed their "trust" in the "goodness" of Canadian legislators and government agencies.  (For those that are THAT naive, I think just pointing out that their trust has already been repeatedly betrayed should suffice: RED FLAG!  http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/eva-prkachin/cses-spying_b_6575142.html)

While definitely not exhaustive, my thoughts are summarized here to avoid repeating the same points in different forums.  I have raised some basic questions: Why? Where? When? What? Who? 


WHY? 

Or rather, why now?  Despite jumping on the US bandwagon in 2003 to go attack a country (Afghanistan) that hadn't attacked Canada, the country hasn't seen any large-scale "terrorist" incident in the last 10 years?  No mass attacks, no plane hijackings, no threats to infrastructure, etc.  Canada is not even mentioned in the threats of most terrorist groups.  The Harper government seized the excuse of a deranged gunman shooting in the Parliament.  But in a country of 30 million, a solitary shooting incident whether it is in the Parliament in Ottawa or in the Eaton Center Mall in Toronto does not become the basis for changing some very serious laws!  

It appears that Canadian lives have more of a threat from drunk driving and operating cellphones while driving than from terrorism!  Current laws have managed to thwart current terrorist threats.  And they are getting more and more invasive, with the Supreme Court opening up Canadians' cell phones to police snooping before Bill C-51 was even passed. RED FLAG!  http://www.corporatesoothsayer.com/2014/12/supreme-court-opens-canadian-phones-to-police-snooping.html.  So why do we need new laws? 


WHAT? 

What are the new laws preventing or targeting anyways?  If they are the nation's reaction to curb terrorism like the Ottawa shooting, how come there are no gun-control provisions in the new law?  Why not de-weaponize our cities?  Who needs a gun in Ottawa, Toronto or Montreal?  Guns are made to kill.  Why should any civilian in today's civilized Canadian society be allowed to buy or possess a gun?  Wouldn't that be more effective? 


WHERE? 

Where should anti-terrorism focus be?  Terrorist threats largely originate outside of Canada.  Terrorist outfits like the Taliban and ISIS rely on weapons supplies and funding to sustain their crimes.  Why is it that new anti-terror legislation does not have a focus on foreign policy and cutting of funding and applying trade embargoes and sanctions against the financiers, funders and supporters of terrorism like Saudi Arabia?  Why is it that instead of severing ties with these terrorist regimes, Canada is busy arming them to crush their civilians' uprisings? RED FLAG!  http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/31/combat-terror-end-support-saudi-arabia-dictatorships-fundamentalism.  Same story in Egypt. http://www.mediacoop.ca/story/canada-backs-violent-military-regime-egypt/33004  Why is our counter-terrorism policy's focus so "inward" looking?  How come the larger global perspective is completely ignored in the counter-terrorism narrative? 


WHEN? 

When did "counter-terrorism" legislation start?  The attacks against the parliament happened in 2014.  However, as this writer pointed out in an earlier post RED FLAG!  (http://www.corporatesoothsayer.com/2012/06/next-stop-canadian-government-to.html), 3 years ago in 2012 the Canadian government established a "counter-terrorism" unit to protect Canada's "energy" industry.  The only threat at that time to Big Oil's infrastructure was from the aboriginals / First Nations opposing pipeline projects and threatening even physical disruptions if the pipelines crossed their lands, disrupting their lives.  So is counter-terrorism merely an extension of the Canadian government's services as private security guards for the Big Oil industry, as observed in the arrests of Burnaby Mountain protesters against the Kinder Morgan pipeline? RED FLAG!  http://www.vancouverobserver.com/news/david-suzuki-burnaby-mountain-support-kinder-morgan-protest. This becomes even more dodgy when seen in conjunction with the Canadian government's muzzling of environment science. http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2014/10/20/stephen-harper-science-research_n_6019806.html


WHO? 

Who defines a "terrorist"?  A casual reading of any anti-terror law or bill would obviously seem innocuous because who wants any leniency for "terrorists"?  But WHO defines a terrorist?  As pointed above, in 2012 the counter-terrorism threat was focusing on First Nations.  Tomorrow it might focus on environmental activists like GreenPeace.  Next, it might focus on protesters like the Occupy movement, the G20 Summit protests in Toronto or other civilian protests.  If the gunman who attacked the Parliament in Ottawa cited Star Wars or a Hollywood movie like "Enemy of the State" as his inspiration, would he be a terrorist?  If he cited a deranged reading of a religion as his inspiration, is he a terrorist?  It becomes even scarier when our Defence Minister cannot define or does not even bother to define it and instead directs inquirers to "look it up" -- as in laws should rely on Google or Wikipedia's (or worse, Urban Dictionary's!) definition of terrorism?! RED FLAG!  http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/peter-mackay-skirts-debate-on-definition-of-terrorism-look-it-up-1.2961934  This is highly problematic as it leaves it open to the interpretation and creates a deliberate vagueness that governments and nefarious politicians can exploit to their advantage to silence dissent and legitimate protests. RED FLAG!   http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/editorials/anti-terrorism-bill-will-unleash-csis-on-a-lot-more-than-terrorists/article22821691/

Dec 14, 2014

Supreme Court opens Canadians' cell phones to police snooping

Watching "RoseWater" last night, I was disgusted that Canadian police have the same powers as Iranian police to snoop into citizens' personal lives without a warrant.  Canadians' cell phones - and their lives -- are now open to the police for snooping, without needing a warrant.  4 judges, 3 of whom were appointed by the conservative Harpocracy of Stephen Harper, gave these broad snooping powers to the police.  

My first reaction on reading the news was: "It is bizarre that 4 people, whose average age is greater than 65 years, can pass landmark judgments without demonstrating that they fully understand the power of the technology that is a cellphone"!  And nobody can do anything about their opinion! 

Firsty let's get the lingo right...  

A "Cell phone" is NOT just a phone today.  

  • It is a computer.
  • It is a repository of private documents.  
  • It is the family photo album.  
  • It is where 80% of all your private conversations happen and are stored. 
  • It is an instrument for activists in a democracy, planning and expressing their dissent.
  • It also is a window into private conversations that your co-workers, professional networks, friends, lovers and relatives have with you -- or with others! 
  • It is also a library of books that you choose to read.
  • It is also your collection of movies and videos you watch.
  • It is a geographical history of your physical movement, places you have been to, businesses you have visited. 
In short, what is left of my private life that is NOT open to a cop that chooses to arrest me?  This is another step towards turning Canada into a police state where a cop can arrest and snoop through all my personal and private data to find more information to use against me.  

I don't feel safe knowing that my political intentions, ambitions and dissenting views (like this one) can be made visible to any policeman without a warrant?  Specially at a time when Americans and Canadians are horrified by police brutality and high-handedness, as evidenced by the widespread protests in the cases of Michael Brown and Eric Garner!    



Ridiculous Conditions don't make citizens feel safer! 


Of course the judiciary in their finely age wisdom didn't just give police access to your lives willy nilly without any checks and balances?  Here are a few checks: 
  • The arrest has to be lawful. (And who gets to decide that on the spot? Let me see, my name is Officer Snoopyreach and I am scratching my head thinking whether this arrest I am making is lawful or not so I am not sure if I want to go through your phone to see if I can find a reason to claim it is lawful?!)
  • The search of the phone must be made promptly.  (Great, so now the first thing a cop MUST do is search through my phone immediately on arresting me because as time goes by, they would not be able to find that precious incriminating evidence that my Facebook and email would provide?)
  • The police don't have a license to just "rummage around the device at will".  (But how are you policing that? What is to prevent a cop who has forced open his way into a cell phone to not click on that tempting "Private Docs" app?).
  • Police must take detailed notes of what private information they looked at and for how long.  (Great! I can imagine a cop taking copious notes like "Errr, went through John's porn collection and stared at the image of a dominatrix whipping a judge for 30 seconds before I orgasmed"). 
While I watch in amusement people freak out every time Facebook and Instagram update their privacy terms, Clueless Canadians will not utter a peep that any copy on the street can arrest them and search through their most private data and life events without a warrant!  

Laws like these are ridiculous not just because they encourage police high-handedness and make activists, demonstrators and dissenters feel unsafe -- they also take away the moral legitimacy for the Canadian government to speak out against censorship, privacy intrusions and snooping by countries like Iran and Israel). 

D'oh Canada! Our privacy stands unguarded and open to thee!